home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1180 / 1180p042.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  89KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | daily | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane
OCR: 30 con itents {which may also ae subject to forfeiture used ir, the proceeds drug transaction) can be "concealed. Other governmental interests also weigh against special rule for real property includ- or ing possible danger to the seizing advance, agents and 1 the the owner's owner oceupant is tipped 1o ir use of hearing obtain discovery (including dis- closure f the ilentity of informants) parallel crim inal invest tigation or trial The conclusion that Calero-Toledo addresses sei- zures of property for forfeiture purposes on cate- quent gorical basis also ir 18 supported by the Court's subse- Von decisions $8850 and United States Neunann 474 U.S. 24 (1986) In $8850, the claim- ant conceded that the government was not constitu- tionally required to afford her an opportunity for hearing bef ...